Comparing Story Openings of Bleak House by Charles Dickens to The Outsi

At the open of the story The Outsider, the writer Albert Camus places cartridge clip in the wrong order. This creates the impression that we argon seeing into the characters thoughts rather than a story being told to us. It works rattling usefully as the paragraphs ar spontaneous and not in each form of order, thus creating a mental picture in our heads of one(a) or two day?s worth of events, as if we were remembering them ourselves.This, however, does not apply to Bleak house. Dickens does not use whatever form of time, but instead decides to describe what is happening and makes the days, time, week or month irrelevant. It could be any day, but Dickens does not requirement time to be the focal point of his story. This is telling because our interest is emaciated to the descriptions and happenings of the city.Surprisingly, both story start with short, unseasonablely composed sentences, most of the time with little or no verbs. This works differently for each story.In ?Th e Outsider?, the short, blunt sentences arouse interest that forces you to continue reading, this is because the ?thoughts? of the character are rather cold and blunt about a situation that should be upsetting, for example ?Mother died today. Or, maybe, yesterday?, as the opening paragraph. The punctuation scat up the sentence into emphasised words. Camus directs us to feel slightly nauseated by his descriptions of the events taken place and puts us in the position of psychologist, bore to hear what comes next, but wary of it also. In ?Bleak House? the short, improper sentences create a very descriptive picture of a cold, fatal city, the blunt words mimicking the blunt feelings and people in the city. This is very effective as he uses the same words over again to emphasize the poin... ...he prime minister and Chancery both being the cause and the centre of the fog, paralleling the wear with the situation. Fog is not a good thing in the chat up of Chancery and the narrator de scribes the Chancery as having a dark and unclear vision. They are not good at their jobs and the narrator calls the old Chancellor as being ?leaden-headed? or ?stupid? to emphasizing his scenerys on that occurrence character.Both story openings, although composed differently, draw the reader in. Both beginning?s, Albert Camus and Charles Dickens, use a variety of techniques, which are all very effective when the author uses them to his will. Either way we get a clear and pointed view of the spot-lit aspects that the author wants us to focus on, and maybe sometime miss the subtle, big information between the lines that are not the centre of attention at that moment in the story.