Shadow Of A Doubt Essay examples -- essays research papers

Shadow of a DoubtShadow of a Doubt is an Alfred Hitchcock make that was shot on location in the 1940s town of Santa Rosa, California. The town itself is vocalisation of the ideal of American society. However, hidden within this picturesque community ugliness corruption threatens to engulf a family. The tale revolves around Uncle Charlie, a psychotic killer whose namesake niece, a teenager girl named Charlie, is emotionally thrilled by her Uncles arrival. However her opinion slowly changes as she probes into her mysterious uncle. In the take on, coach/producer Alfred Hitchcock blends conventions of film noir with those of a small town domestic comedy as a means of commenting on the contradictions in American values.      In the beginning the film is immediately set up in the film noir style. Under the opening credits a shadowy backround image is shown kaleidoscopically. Couples dressed to kill(p) in elegant ballroom gowns and suits waltz together dizzyingl y as the " joyous Widow Waltz" plays. The thought has nonhing to do with the drama to meet (until Charlies crimes be revealed.) The titles dissolve in to a panoramic view of a bridge, further dissolves take us first to junkyard and then to a scene of children playing in the street. The city is shown as a dirty, dark place. We are taken to a Philadelphia rooming house (shown with a number 13 on the door.) Inside we are introduced to "Uncle Charlie" (Joseph Cotten). He is reclining stiffly in hindquarters during the twenty-four hour period in a go tody room. . He plays with the phallic cigar that he is smoking, plainly bitter and cynical. On the bedside table next to seemingly indifferent and fatigued man is and an open billfold with a carelessly strewn pile of bills on top (some of the bills have fallen to the floor and lie strewn around). The overweight, middle-aged landlady knocks on the door and enters, identifying him as Mr. Spencer and informing him that two men have been postulation for him. As per his instructions to not disturb him, she didnt let them in, however, they have not left, instead they retreated to the street corner to stake out the embarkation house. Noticing that he looks exhausted and depressed (he passively remains on his bed during their entire conversation), she suggests that he should get some rest. Then she notices his money fill up all about and hurries forward to straighten it ... ...of all accountability (for, of course, thither is no way that a normal person could ever kill.) In keeping with this principle the film attempts to absolve Young Charlie from all responsibility in her Uncles death, for it is seen as an accident that occurred when Young Charlie was fighting her Uncle in self-defence. In the final stages of the film we are brought back to the small town introduced to us in the beginning, this time, however, it is in morning for a beloved son. Charlies death has brought whole wheat flour back to Young Charlie. We can see the good side has win the battle for her. As in early situational Charlie has learned her moral lesson and the fact may end.      This paper has attempted to investigate the ways in which Alfred Hitchcock blend conventions of film noir with those of a small town domestic comedy. It first looked at the opening scenes of the film in which the two conventions were introdruced. It then went on to discerp the film with the aid of Robin Woods article Ideology, Genre, Auteur. From these two forms we can see that film noir and small town comedy were used as a means of commenting on the contradictions in American values.