Western Civilization Reflection Paper # 5

How did the rulers of early medieval Europe manage Charlemagne, Otto of Saxony, Alfred the Great, and William the Conqueror set certain precedents for their emerging nations? Well for starters, Charlemagne did bring a upstanding lot to the table. The only significant affaire I got out of him was the fact that he split his empire into countries, with a sum of 300 counts watching those territories. Otto brought his German self, and conquered any of the Holy Roman Empire. He starts the election process.Otto gets recognized by the Byzantines and Constantine, and wherefore ultimately the pope recognizes him as well. That in and of its self shows that Otto was a legit ruler Alfred has to cash in ones chips in bog-like territory for a while. He was bookish, literate, big reader, fairly religious, and an effective warrior victimization guerilla warf atomic number 18 tactics. He finally takes back his kingdom and is recognized as the starting official King of England. It shows that he was able to tough it out, and was a strong ruler when he took back his kingdom.Edward was eccentric, and preoccupy with death. He also did not pay back any sons or daughters. He builds the first cathedral, which is located in Westminster. Got to love dudes that are eccentric He actually reminds me of Dumbledore from scourge Potter. ? William was tall, over 6 feet. William got stuff done, and didnt take no nonsense from no one. That is where he got his boring yet unpitying reputation. William ends up battling for England, and wins which is no surprise. William ends up creating a good system of which the government ran.