Contract Law Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Contract Law - Case Study ensampleIf Y misrepresents an offer to Z, it is a specific offer and Z is the only person who can yield it. But in many cases, it is immaterial to whom the offer is made. Offers made by advertisement are the commonest general anatomy of offers made to the world at large, and can be accepted by anyone by acting on them. 2For this case, Igor made an offer through advertisement and it was to be accepted by anyone who acted on the advertisement. jonquil acting on the advertisement accepted the offer through the post in an betrothal earn he wrote on January 29th. The advertisement said that anyone accepting to the offer must reply to the Ritz Hotel in capital of the United Kingdom by February 1st.A contract had already been entered into between Igor and Jonquil immediately a letter of acceptance was posted. It is immaterial that Igor sold the guitar since he had not received any acceptance from Jonquil. The acceptance is considered complete immediately the letter of acceptance is posted, even if it is preoccupied or destroyed in the post so that it neer arrived. As long as the offeree can prove that he posted the letter of acceptance, the court go out enforce the contract.b) Ali had made a contract between him and Blessing Builders for a fixed price of 5,000 nevertheless when the repair of the kitchen was half way finished Ali added them a further 700 since he heard the they were likely to unconstraint the work since they had under priced the job. It is immaterial for Ali to fail to pay them the extra 700 he had added them just because he lost money on the strain market. The extra 700 he added to encourage them to complete the repair of thekitchen had not been committed to any condition that failure of not making enough money on the stock market, would make him not pay them the extra amount. For this case, Blessing Builders should be paid their promise of an extra 700 since it was not committed to any condition. It is immateria l that he is failing to pay them since he made losses on the stock market. For this case, Blessing Builders may sue Ali for damages. Ali should not withhold the extra 700 he promised to give Blessing Builders upon shutdown of repairing the kitchen. 4c) On the case where Neil was advised by his uncle to leave Manchester where he worked as an insurance salesclerk to undertake a dentist course as he give him monthly allowances, the uncle should be sued for ravish of contract. Neil enjoyed a full social life in Manchester as he worked as an insurance clerk. His uncle break up his social life by advising him to take a dentist course in London as he promised to give him monthly allowances while studying. For this case, there was an intention to create