Rhetorical Analysis Essay Example for Free

rhetorical Analysis EssayDo you struggle to find equilibrium between excelling at cast and expense productive, quality time with loved ones at post? With the technology that is available in the twenty head start century, it is now possible for better professed(prenominal)s to decide whether they would like to forge from central office and collaborate with family members to meet work demands. Alesia capital of Alabama is an African American Ethnographer who wrote Kitchen Conferences and Garage Cubicles The Merger of Home and Work in the 24-7 Global miserliness. This study was one of many published in 2008s book entitled The Changing landscape painting of Work and Family in the American Middle Class Reports From the Field, which focused on providing insights into the changing nature of functional families in the United States (1008). Montgomerys main purpose is that todays modern social club and global economy have enabled families to merge work and home in quasi-entrep reneurial ways (1018), which pull up stakes in turn deepen the attachment between family members.Her lower-ranking cite is that the merging of these two worlds does non fare without a downside your home go forth no longer serve as a refuge from barter pressures (1018) and job demands may be made more invasive by the use of innovative converse technology (1019). The main purpose of this essay is to identify and analyze Montgomerys main and secondary debates, to describe two types of support she uses, how they help her claims, and to identify her intend audience.Montgomery proposes that interlingual renditions in gender relations, steering strategies, and technological practices (1018) play integral roles in the opportunities for families to decide how to combine or balance their home lives with work demands. She goes on to state that womens access to equal education and equal employment opportunities have expand the possibilities for spousal collaboration in technical profe ssions (1010), and that being able to collaborate on work projects at home will create a more intimate and interdependent family.She then contributes statistics showing the function of women graduating with a degree in engineering jumped 16. 5% in just 30 years (1011). The statistics provide hard evidence to her claim that women are gaining increasing access to technology based jobs, and courts to the readers logos. Montgomery spent a period of five years in the field following a correspond in their thirties, who were living in one of these collaborative, job-sharing (1012) middle class families in order to declare a view of the world from their perspective (1008).Basing her argument off this research provides a stronger emotional fellowship to the report than if Montgomery were to use sweeping generalizations throughout. Montgomery structures her essay in a narrative format, writing in the first person. She was successful at attempting to appeal to her audiences ethos by ma king her writing less formal while keeping an educated voice. The writing opens with an introduction to Marjenah and Steve, who share a home with Marjenahs parents in Silicon Valley.Montgomery appeals to her readers pathos by illustrating the familys world Emails, faxes and phone calls joined their home to high-tech firms within Silicon Valley. Although there were no parking lots or numbered suites, their areawas, in some sense, a busy industrial park (1009). Montgomery recalls the different ways in which they rely upon each other, and states that the interdependence this family possesses is an opportunity for each member help one another conduct job demands.She details the countless nights Steve spent on his wifes projects after getting home from his job as well as the way Marjenah was needed to proof read Steves reports and to reappraisal her mothers paperwork for her department store job. The father worked at an outside tech firm, but served as the familys technical support ( 1016). This ethnographic research directly relates to her main point that equality in the education within a family has enabled collaboration in the home, and allows us to spend more time with those we love. feature the statistics that show women gaining access to technical jobs are increasing with the representation of a modern, job-sharing family that include both sexes collaborating on high-tech projects helps validate the essays argument. Montgomerys goal is to inform families of new opportunities on how to balance work and home purport, so in order to provide a full watch she explores the potential downsides to living in a modern job-sharing family.Montgomerys secondary claim states that working collaboratively on job tasks at home (1018) will increase family cohesion (1018), but that this combination will in turn eliminate the idea of your home being an escape from job pressures. She helps substantiate this argument by referring again to the subjects of her study, an emotion al appeal. Steve summarized his perception of the piazza, explaining that job demands limited the control that they had all over the time and home of family living (1019).Montgomery understands her audience connect to this point on an emotional level by describing the conflicts the couple experienced because of the stresses their job-sharing created. She details Marjenah having to constantly manage sounds (1015), as well as the couple getting into arguments over the amount of energy each puts into one anothers work, citing that sometimes the main incentive for them to recognise up was the pressure of work calling again. It is clear to the reader that Montgomery is simply making an argument to explore this alternative lifestyle.She uses many different types of support throughout her writing in order to make her argument more informative two will be analyzed further. Montgomery continuously includes professional opinions with quotations from past studies that are on the equiva lent topic as her own work. This gives the reader necessary play down knowledge on the topic, by allowing the audience to have a more complete understanding as to how the economy has been playing a role in the decisions we make regarding how we balance our lives, since the Industrial Revolution.She opens with a quote from nineteenth century writer John Ruskin, which states home will only be home, until the anxieties of the outer life penetrate into it (1008). This grabs her readers attention, and provides a possible thesis for her writing. Montgomery explains separating work and home life has not always been the normal ideal, swelled her reader a brief history on the transformation of family labor from agrarian to high-tech work (1010). She does this with quotes and ideas from over ten different sources, many of the sources she chose are cognise in the fields of Anthropology and Sociology.This is extremely helpful for her ethical appeal, because it shows Montgomery took the time to gain an understanding of the contextual relevance of her selected topic. Some of the work she cites claims things such as In the early twentieth century, corporations supplanted many family firms, credentialed engineers replaced informally trained mechanics, and big sciencerose to prominence. (1011) and that Industrial transformationsincreasingly removed production from the home, while heathenish transformations valorized home as a haven from the harsh work world (1010).This relates to the quote she opens with, because Ruskin was one of the numerous writers pushing to get the rising middle class to embrace this new ideal (1010), raising the point of the motives behind said quote. Including other pieces of writing that claim technology is what played a key cistron in changing the way individuals and families balanced their two lives, historically, helps her introduce the idea that separate spheres are not necessarily the most desirable family and work forms (1018). Montgomery uses examples to support her arguments, which helps create a mental cypher in her audiences mind while reading her work.Her research gathered while with Marjenahs family, is her most used example, and is a very effective form of support. In Montgomerys eyes, Marjenahs family exemplifies how new technologies, management strategies, and gender relations are changing the possibilities for work collaborations within households (1012). She refers to their specific situation as a way to personalize Montgomerys generalized emphasis on womens equality in education and job opportunities as being the main factor in union once again giving families the option to draw in and collaborate on work.She uses examples while giving her audience background knowledge of this topic. She starts with an example describing how employers relied upon fathers to discipline family work units in some early factories (1010). She makes the claim that shop-keeping families saw kin as sources of income (1010), mor e specifically using examples such as the bakers wife iced cakes a few steps from her husband, the butcher and his son chopped meat on the same counter, and for the family of grocers home and work merged (1010).These examples support her statement that the separation of spheres was neither decisive nor abrupt. (1010). Montgomery does a sufficient job regarding the amount of support she provides her audience with to back up her argument. Every writer has an intended audience. Montgomerys study was published in a book that has a goal to bring out how culture shapes family life during shifting social and economic landscapes, so it should address a fairly educated audience.The background information provided implies that she was keeping in mind the fact that not everyone who picks up her book will have an understanding of the different norms our society has gone through regarding the separation of work and home life. To conclude, Montgomery was very successful in presenting her argume nt that contemporary gender relations, management strategies and technological practices enable divers(prenominal) family and work formsFar from weakening family bonds, these mergers of work foster family cohesion (1010).She appealed to her audiences logos by providing facts, statistics, expert opinions, and by citing other pieces of work on her topic. This also helped her ethical appeal, as did the personal later detailing her background and her credentials. Using the example of Marjenahs family, along with the baker, butcher and grocers, helped Montgomery emotionally appeal to her audience, and to get her point across. Overall, Montgomery presented her argument very clearly it was fact based, and very informative which makes her beta purpose a success.