The Issues of Family Law in Australia and New Zealand Assignment

The Issues of Family Law in Australia and New Zealand - Assignment ExampleThe political sympathies riposte that cohabitants should marry misses the point. All cohabitants need to be quite clear as to whether they have each upright interest in a property and how to secure it. In Australia3 and New Zealand4 unmarried cohabitants rights argon recognized by legislation, common law, and equity. The principle of unjust enrichment has been utilized in both these countries and Canada.5 Domestic duties solely have never sufficed in English law to found a claim for a beneficial share, whilst they do in Canada low the concept of the remedial constructive trust. Hence in Peter v Beblow6 a woman who cared for her own and her partners children did the housework and contributed money to the housekeeping was able to keep the house under a constructive trust on the basis that her partner would otherwise be unjustly enriched by her services. In Hammon v Mitchell7- an English case - a woman who did unpaid work for her partner, raised their children and well-kept the home as well as supporting him in his speculative ventures failed to acquire any beneficial share. Remedial trusts are imposed where there is a direct link between substantial confirmative contributions and the acquisition or improvement of property otherwise, compensation could be available on a quantum meruit basis. The trustee has a duty to convey the property to the claimant who sues on quasi-contractual grounds. In order to establish an unjust enrichment claim, there unavoidably to be evidence ofenrichment, a corresponding deprivation, and the absence of any juristic reason for the enrichment. Examples of enrichment include planetary house expenses, domestic work and repairs, and maintenance. The courts have not accepted willing assistance.